Humanisasi Teknologi dalam Pendidikan: Analisis Filsafat Terhadap Ancaman Dehumanisasi di Era Pembelajaran Digital Berbasis AI

Authors

  • Nihayatus Sholihah Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri
  • Ari Abi Aufa Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/hikmah.v2i4.1453

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Dehumanization, Education, Humanism, Philosophy Of Technology

Abstract

The rapid digital transformation occurring in the field of education, particularly through the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), has created new opportunities for improving learning efficiency, personalizing instruction, and supporting educators’ workloads. However, these advancements also bring forth significant philosophical challenges, especially the potential for dehumanization within the educational process. This article examines how technology influences the fundamental human dimensions of learning and how the concept of humanization can serve as an ethical framework for designing and implementing educational technologies. AI-based digital learning environments often position learners as data objects, reducing the dialogical, empathetic, and relational aspects that are fundamental to humanistic education. Drawing on philosophical perspectives from existentialism and humanism, this study evaluates the potential threats to student autonomy, critical thinking, and character formation. Furthermore, it explores how the human–technology relationship can be ethically framed through the theory of technological mediation and Paulo Freire’s notion of liberatory education. The analysis indicates that technology can be humanized by emphasizing meaningful interaction, ensuring algorithmic transparency, and strengthening the role of teachers as mediators of values and empathy. Ultimately, the article argues that the benefits of AI in education can only be fully realized when technological development and implementation are guided by an ethical orientation that places human beings at the center. This study contributes to ongoing discussions on the role of technology in education and provides a critical perspective aimed at minimizing the risk of dehumanization in an era increasingly shaped by AI-driven digital learning.

References

Apriyadi, F., & Noviani, D. (2024). Konsep Humanisasi dalam Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Kajian Agama Islam, Vol. 8 (11).

Arbayah. (2013). Model Pembelajaran Humanistik. Dinamika Ilmu, 13(3):204-20.

Biesta, G. (2017). The Rediscovery of Teaching. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617497

Borgias, F. (2010). Teknologi dan Manusia. Jakarta: Obor.

Darmaningsih, P., Niwayan, Wahyuni, D. S., Parthasindu, & Gede, I. (2020). Efektivitas Media E-Learning Dengan Model Experiential Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Dasar Desain Grafis Kelas X Di Smk Negeri 1 Sukasada. Karmapati: Kumpulan Artikel Pendidikan Teknik Informatika, 9(2).

Dewi, Sastra, N. N., Astawan, I. G., & Margunayasa, I. G. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Mimbar Pgsd Undiksha, 8(2).

Driyarkara. (2006). Karya Lengkap Driyarkara. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641321.001.0001

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Bloomsbury.

Hardiman, F. B. (2015). Seni Memahami: Hermeneutika dari Schleiermacher sampai Derrida. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Hasanah, U. (2021). Pendidikan Humanis di Era Digital. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2979/3108.0

Ilmadi, & Rahman, A. N. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Reflektif Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis. Lebesgue, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v1i1.8

Kaelan. (2014). Pendidikan Pancasila. Yogyakarta: Paradigma.

Kuntowijoyo. (2002). Selamat Tinggal Mitos, Selamat Datang Realitas. Bandung: Mizan.

Maryati, I., & Monica, V. (2021). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Dan Inkuiri Dalam Kemampuan Representasi Matematis. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v10i2.1308

Maulidiya,, Martati, B., & Putra, D. A. (2023). Analisis Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Tipe Buzz Group Dalam Peningkatan Keaktifan Siswa SD. Al- Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v7i1.1882

Munir. (2017). Pembelajaran Digital. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Naim, N. (2018). Menjadi Guru Inspiratif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Nipan, Purwoko, B., & Susarno, L. H. (2024). Filsafat pendidikan dalam era teknologi: Transformasi nilai dan metode pembelajaran. Jurnal Adijaya Multidisplin.

Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. California: University of California Press.

O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction. New York: Crown.

Qodri, A. (2017). Teori Belajar Humanistik Dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pedagogik , 04(02):188-202.

Rahmalia, I., & Utari, S. (2021). The Effect Of Project Based Learning (Pbl) In Writing Skill. Edulia: English Education, Linguistic And Art Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.31539/edulia.v1i2.2347

Saekawati, R., & Nasrudin, H. (2021). Effectiveness Of Guided Inquiry-Based On Blended Learning In Improving Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.36947

Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suseno-Magnis, F. (1987). Etika Dasar. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Suyanto. (2020). Dinamisasi Pendidikan di Era Digital. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Tilaar, H. (2012). Manifesto Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Kompas.

Widiyanto. (2023). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Blended Learning Berbasis Web Centric Course Moodle Pada Materi Koloid. Edutech : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Berbantuan Teknologi , 3(1). https://doi.org/10.51878/edutech.v3i1.2119

Williamson, B. (2017). Big Data in Education: The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714920

Zed, M. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Zubair, A. B. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

Nihayatus Sholihah, & Ari Abi Aufa. (2025). Humanisasi Teknologi dalam Pendidikan: Analisis Filsafat Terhadap Ancaman Dehumanisasi di Era Pembelajaran Digital Berbasis AI. Hikmah : Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(4), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.61132/hikmah.v2i4.1453

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.