Persepsi Mahasiswa Mengenai Pelaksanaan Layanan Pendidikan Mata Kuliah Pendidikan Agama Islam di FMIPA Unikaltar Tahun Akademik 2021/2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/karakter.v2i3.1186Keywords:
Satisfaction Survey, Validity, Reliability Test, Service Improvement, StudentAbstract
The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA) of the University of East Kalimantan (Unikaltar) consistently conducts satisfaction surveys to improve the quality of services provided to students. This survey aims to evaluate the performance of each work unit, including lecturers, with the hope that the results obtained can identify aspects that are still hampering or suboptimal. The survey results serve as the basis for formulating steps to improve and enhance the quality of educational services within the faculty. This study specifically highlights the level of student satisfaction with the performance of lecturers in the Islamic Religious Education course. The survey implementation process includes several stages, starting from data collection using a survey instrument, the data input process, and testing the validity and reliability of the instrument to ensure data reliability. Next, the collected data is processed and analyzed to obtain an objective picture of student perceptions. Based on the analysis, the student satisfaction index value obtained is 3.16. This figure is in the "Good" or "Satisfied" category, indicating that students are generally satisfied with the service and learning process carried out by lecturers in the course. These findings provide important input for the institution in maintaining and improving the quality of learning, particularly in the field of religious studies. In the future, it is hoped that similar surveys can continue to be carried out periodically so that the service improvement process can run continuously.
References
Arikunto, S. (2006). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bumi Aksara.
Azwar, S. (2014). Metode penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.
Azwar, S. (2019). Reliabilitas dan validitas (Edisi ke-4). Pustaka Pelajar.
Dzelzkaleja, L., & Kapenieks, J. (2018). Contradictions in higher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0008 https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-6-28
Mardatillah. (2020). Pengembangan diri dosen. Jurnal Psikologi, 9(3), 176-184. https://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/PSIKO/article/view/3951/pdf https://doi.org/10.30872/psikostudia.v9i3.3951
Miarso, Y. (2004). Profesionalisme: Pengembangan dosen dalam rangka peningkatan mutu perguruan tinggi. Rineka Cipta.
Mohammadi, M., & Moradi, K. (2017). Exploring change in EFL teachers' perceptions of professional development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(1), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2017-0002
Ranti, K. (2021). Analisis tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap kinerja dosen (Program Studi Usaha Perjalanan Wisata). Menara Ilmu, 15(1), Oktober 2021. https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/menarailmu/article/download/2868/pdf
Sarjono, Y. (2007). Faktor-faktor strategi pelayanan dosen dan dampaknya terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta tahun akademik 2005-2006. Varidika, 9(1). https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/677
Sepri, N. (2022). Analisis tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap kinerja dosen Program Studi Administrasi Bisnis Politeknik Negeri Padang. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(3). https://jiip.stkipyapisdompu.ac.id/jiip/index.php/JIIP/article/view/494 https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i3.494
Sopiatin. (2010). Manajemen belajar berbasis kepuasan siswa. Ghalia Indonesia.
Srinadi. (2008). Faktor-faktor penentu kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap pelayanan fakultas sebagai lembaga pendidikan. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 27. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11061546.pdf
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mix methods). Alfabeta.
Van Hong, B., Tuyen, T., & Luong, N. T. (2018). Teaching capacity of technology teachers: Applying in the training program of technology teacher in Vietnam. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(12), 1662-1667. https://pubs.sciepub.com/education/6/12/11/index.html



