Kritik One Dimensional Man sebagai Upaya Emansipasi Manusia dan Pembangkitan Kesadaran Kritis Menurut Herbert Marcuse

Authors

  • Kristo Ronaldo Suri Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira
  • Norbertus Jegalus Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira
  • Leonardus Mali Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/nubuat.v2i3.1238

Keywords:

Capitalism, Consciousness, Emancipation, Marcuse, Technology

Abstract

This article examines Herbert Marcuse's thoughts in One Dimensional Man as a critique of the dominance of technology and capitalism in shaping the one-dimensional consciousness of modern humans. Using a critical philosophical approach, this study examines how digital technology, which was originally projected as an instrument of liberation, has actually transformed into a subtle means of oppression through the mechanisms of false needs and irrational rationality. Instead of opening up a space for emancipation, technological developments often deepen human attachment to the logic of the consumption-oriented digital capitalist system. The main goal of this research is to reawaken critical awareness and human negation in the midst of virtual reality that increasingly dominates life in the Society 5.0 era. The results of the study show that digital humans tend to experience existential alienation, where deep reflection and authentic freedom are reduced by the flow of instant information, pseudo-entertainment, and consumptive lifestyles. This condition makes individuals trapped in a cycle of obedience to a system that seems rational, when in fact it covers structural dominance. The discussion emphasized the importance of emancipation efforts through the rejection of the dominant system and the reactivation of critical potential as a path to true freedom. Emancipation is understood not only as a release from the shackles of technology, but also as an effort to revive reflective consciousness that is able to negate false values. Thus, Marcuse's thought remains relevant to reading the crisis of contemporary human consciousness while providing a philosophical foundation for the formation of a reflective, independent, and autonomous subject.

References

Agrindo, Z. (2023). Diskursus Homo Digitalis dalam tinjauan dimensi material dan substansial kebudayaan. Perspektif. https://doi.org/10.69621/jpf.v18i2.190

Antonius, J., Siallagan, S., Aurelia, T., Yuya, P., & Arshyara, S. (2024). Penggunaan kecerdasan buatan (AI) mengakibatkan krisis pemikiran kritis pelajar dalam dunia pendidikan Indonesia. Pendidikan Tambusai.

Arsita, A. (2023). Rekontekstualisasi bentang ruang pamer virtual. In Implementasi Kontekstualisasi Seni di Tengah Masyarakat Era 5.0. ISI Yogyakarta.

Ayuningtyas, A. A. (2022). Penerapan Internet of Things (IoT) dalam upaya mewujudkan perpustakaan digital di era Society 5.0. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan.

Aziz, A. R. A. (2022). Perilaku konsumtif masyarakat Indonesia dalam perspektif Herbert Marcuse. Sophia Dharma: Jurnal Filsafat, Agama Hindu, dan Masyarakat. https://doi.org/10.53977/sd.v5i2.725

Bey, V. (2023). Fenomena artificial intelligence dan bahaya dehumanisasi. Akademika.

Editor, Tapung, M. M., & Jelahut, M. S. (Eds.). (2021). Bunga rampai: Diskursus sosial humaniora Covid-19: Bonum atau Malum? Penerbit Unika Santu Paulus Ruteng.

Hardiman, F. B. (2018). Manusia dalam prahara revolusi digital. Diskursus: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi STF Driyarkara. https://doi.org/10.36383/diskursus.v17i2.252

Ishaq, A., & Saksono, E. H. (2023). Kapitalisme digital dalam media sosial YouTube: Kritik terhadap perkembangan teknologi digital berdasarkan pemikiran Herbert Marcuse. Jurnal Mahardika Adiwidia. https://doi.org/10.36441/mahardikaadiwidi.v2i2.1730

Khairiyah, A., Hastari, E. D., Maisaroh, I., Ariansyah, P. F., Rini, D. S., Sumiyati, Rahayu, L. W., Oktaviani, R. D., Syarifah, S., Sukron, A. A., Rini, D. S., Sholikhah, M., Ramadian, M., Handarini, Y. E., Hawari, R., Fatahillah, A., & Syahdina, D. N. (2018). Homo Digitalis: Manusia dan teknologi di era digital (Issue May). Elmatera.

Kwirinus, D., Pandor, P., & Yuniarto, P. (2024). Technology as a means of human liberation in the perspective of Herbert Marcuse. International Journal of Indonesian Philosophy & Theology. https://doi.org/10.47043/ijipth.v5i2.73

Misra, S. (2022). Revitalizing human values in an age of technology. Philosophies, 7(6), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7060136

Stuart, F. (2019, April 23). Marcuse and "technological rationality". The Junction. https://thejunction.space/2019/04/23/marcuse-and-technological-rationality

Sumarni, L., & Seran, A. (2024). Dialektika progresif; One Dimensional Man, desublimasi represif: Kritik Herbert Marcuse atas masyarakat industri modern. Humanus: Jurnal Sosiohumaniora Nusantara. https://doi.org/10.62180/e64yn883

Supriadi, I. (2025). Makna dialektika dalam pemikiran Hegel dan Marx. Cavsar.net. https://www.kavsar.net/makna-kata-dialektika-dalam-pemikiran-hegel-dan-marx

Tharik, A. (2019). Marxisme dan psikoanalisis: Mengulas pemikiran Herbert Marcuse tentang masyarakat modern. LSF Discourse. https://lsfdiscourse.org/marxisme-dan-psikoanalisis-mengulas-pemikiran-herbert-marcuse-tentang-masyarakat-modern

Tjahyadi, S. (2007). Teori sosial dalam perspektif teori kritis Max Horkheimer. Jurnal Filsafat.

Ummah, M. S. (2019). Rasionalitas teknologis Herbert Marcuse. Sustainability (Switzerland).

Vieta, B. M. (2006). Herbert Marcuse's critique of technological rationality: An exegetical reading. Technology.

Winarso, K. A. D. (2020). Dominasi teknologi dan kapitalisme (perspektif teori kritis Herbert Marcuse). Forum: Filsafat dan Teologi. https://doi.org/10.35312/forum.v49i2.248

Yudi, L. (2023). Marcuse's critical theory of technical rationality. Art and Performance Letters, 4(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.23977/artpl.2023.040407

Downloads

Published

2025-08-22

How to Cite

Kristo Ronaldo Suri, Norbertus Jegalus, & Leonardus Mali. (2025). Kritik One Dimensional Man sebagai Upaya Emansipasi Manusia dan Pembangkitan Kesadaran Kritis Menurut Herbert Marcuse. Nubuat : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Kristen Dan Katolik, 2(3), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.61132/nubuat.v2i3.1238