Filsafat Bahasa Wittgenstein dan Relevansinya bagi Dialog Agama Kontemporer

Authors

  • Andhara Andhara Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Asriani Matondang Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Javier Daffa Ismail Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Mardhiah Abbas Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/akhlak.v3i1.1653

Keywords:

Contemporary Interreligious Dialogue, Language Games, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophy, Religious Language

Abstract

Interreligious dialogue in contemporary plural societies faces serious challenges, particularly due to differences in the use and interpretation of religious language, which is often understood in a monolithic and decontextualized manner. Religious language is frequently reduced to doctrinal propositions debated through logical arguments, thereby neglecting the form of life from which it emerges. This study aims to analyze the transformation of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s thought from the picture theory presented in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus to the concept of language games developed in Philosophical Investigations, as well as its implications for understanding religious language and contemporary interreligious dialogue. This research employs a qualitative approach using a library research method through philosophical-conceptual analysis of Wittgenstein’s major works and relevant secondary literature. The findings indicate that the concept of language games allows religious language to be understood as a social practice with internal rules and contextual meanings, rather than as metaphysical propositions subject to empirical-logical verification. In the context of interreligious dialogue, this approach helps explain differences in the meanings of religious terms such as “salvation” or “God” without treating them as absolute logical contradictions. By viewing religious language as part of language games rooted in distinct forms of life, interreligious dialogue can be directed toward mutual understanding and respect for diversity rather than the pursuit of theological uniformity.

References

Amtiran, A. A., & Kriswibowo, A. (2024). Kepemimpinan agama dan dialog antaragama: Strategi pembangunan masyarakat multikultural berbasis moderasi beragama. Jayapangus Press Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 8(3), 329–350. https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v8i3.3165

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.

Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.21236/AD0616323

Fikri, K., & Firdausiyah, U. W. (2021). Reinterpretasi teori language game dalam bahasa dakwah perspektif Ludwig Wittgenstein. Journal of Islamic Civilization, 3(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.33086/jic.v3i2.2374

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society; T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.

Hacker, P. M. S. (2001). Wittgenstein: Connections and controversies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019924569X.001.0001

Hartini, L. (2019). Tata permainan bahasa Wittgenstein dalam teks konstitusi. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i1.204

Hick, J. (1989). An interpretation of religion: Human responses to the transcendent. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371286

Idi, A., & Priansyah, D. (2023). The role of religious moderation in Indonesian multicultural society: A sociological perspective. Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health, 2(4), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v2i4.55

Kaelan. (2004). Filsafat analitis menurut Ludwig Wittgenstein: Relevansinya bagi pengembangan pragmatik. Jurnal Humaniora, 16(2), 133–141.

Kenny, A. (1973). Wittgenstein. Harvard University Press.

Labur, B. (2022). Tata permainan bahasa Wittgenstein sebagai klarifikasi. LSF Discourse.

Marx, K. (1990). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1; B. Fowkes, Trans.). Penguin Books.

Monk, R. (1990). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The duty of genius. Jonathan Cape.

Mustansyir, R. (2001). Filsafat analitik: Sejarah, perkembangan dan peranan para tokohnya. Pustaka Pelajar.

Nole, O. A. (2023). Tuhan, manusia, dan bahasa menurut Ludwig Wittgenstein: Suatu tinjauan filsafat agama. Sanjiwani: Jurnal Filsafat, 14(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.25078/sjf.v14i2.2579

Phillips, D. Z. (2001). Religion and the hermeneutics of contemplation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612718

Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. Vintage Books.

Santoso, B. (2023). Filsafat kesadaran manusia. Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Nasional.

Schulte, J. (1992). Wittgenstein: An introduction. State University of New York Press.

Sluga, H., & Stern, D. G. (Eds.). (1996). The Cambridge companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521460255

Suyitno, H. (2007). Pengaruh pemikiran Wittgenstein terhadap matematika. Jurnal Filsafat, 17(3), 277–291.

Tarumingkeng, R. C. (2025). Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein (1889–1951). RUDYCT e-PRESS. https://rudyct.com/ab/Ludwig.Josef.Johann.Wittgenstein(1889-1951).pdf

Usuluddin, W. (2004). Ludwig Wittgenstein: Pemikiran ketuhanan dan implikasinya terhadap kehidupan keagamaan di era modern. Pustaka Pelajar.

Waluyo, M. E. (2022). Filsafat analitik Ludwig Wittgenstein dan implikasinya dalam kajian agama. Lenternal: Learning and Teaching Journal, 3(3), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.32923/lenternal.v3i3.3188

Weber, M. (2001). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). Routledge.

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-07

How to Cite

Andhara Andhara, Asriani Matondang, Javier Daffa Ismail, & Mardhiah Abbas. (2026). Filsafat Bahasa Wittgenstein dan Relevansinya bagi Dialog Agama Kontemporer. Akhlak : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Filsafat, 3(1), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.61132/akhlak.v3i1.1653

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.