Transformasi Pembelajaran Dengan Teknologi: Analisis Kritis Dari Lensa Teori Post-Positivisme, Kritis, Dan Konstruktivisme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/akhlak.v2i1.399Keywords:
Post-positivism Theory, Critical Theory, Contructivism Theory, Transformation of Learning and, TechnologyAbstract
Technology has undoubtedly revolutionized the way we learn and acquire knowledge. In recent years, there has been a significant shift towards integrating technology into educational practices, with the aim of enhancing the learning experience for students. This transformation has sparked a debate among educators and researchers about the implications of this shift on the traditional methods of teaching and learning. Some argue that technology has the potential to democratize education and provide equal opportunities for all learners, while others express concerns about the impact of digital distractions and the loss of face-to-face interaction. Through the lens of post-positivism, criticality, and constructivism theory, this critical analysis aims to explore the complexities of the transformation of learning with technology. By examining the underlying assumptions and implications of integrating technology into education, we can gain a deeper understanding of how it may shape the future of learning. This analysis will delve into the various perspectives and theories surrounding the use of technology in education, considering both the benefits and drawbacks. Through a balanced examination of the evidence, we hope to uncover the key factors that will determine the success of technology in shaping the future of learning. Ultimately, the goal is to provide insights that will guide educators and policymakers in making informed decisions about integrating technology into educational practices.
References
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford University Press.
Astini, N. K. S. (2020). Tantangan Dan Peluang Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Pembelajaran Online Masa Covid-19. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2), 241–255.
Azizah, S. L. (2024). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital dalam Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme: Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan di Era Digital. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurdikbud.v4i1.2838
Bozkurt, A., et al. (2020). A Global Outlook to the Interruption of Education Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Open Praxis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341977677
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Eka, F. N. (2023). Teori Sosial Kognitif Tinjauan Kritis Teori Pendidikan Yang Relevan Bagi Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v23i1.29307. 21-26
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.
Legi, Hendrik dkk. (2023). Pembelajaran Transformatif Kurikulum Merdeka di Era Digital. Journal Education Innovation. https://jurnal.ypkpasid.org/index.php/jei
McLaren, P. (2003). Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education. Allyn & Bacon.
Muslih, Muhammad. 2004. Filsafat Ilmu; Kajian Atas Asumsi Dasar. Yogyakarta: Belukar.
Muslih, Mohammad. 2004. Filsafat Ilmu: Suatu Pengantar. Pustaka Pelajar.
Nugraha, Wildan., & Herdiana, Dodi. (2024). Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme dan Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan. https://jurnaledu.com/index.php/je
Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Human Learning (8th Edition). Pearson Education.
Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and Educational Research. Rowman & Littlefield.
Popper, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, 1934.
Pribadi. 2011. Model ASSURE untuk Mendesain Pembelajaran Sukses. Jakarta: PT. Dian Rakyat.
Piaget, Jean. The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge, 1950.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Pearson Education.
Thobroni, M. (2015). Belajar & Pembelajaran: Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
