Aliran-Aliran Filsafat dan Relevansinya dalam Pemikiran Modern

Authors

  • Siti Ulfatul Faizah Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Agung Winarno Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Subagyo Subagyo Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/moral.v2i4.1553

Keywords:

Epistemology, Modern Thought, Philosophical Schools, Philosophy, Theory of Knowledge

Abstract

The development of philosophy from the classical to the contemporary era shows fundamental changes in the way humans understand reality with the emergence of various schools of thought that address epistemological, ontological, and ethical issues in an increasingly complex social context. This study aims to examine the contributions of key concepts from rationalism, empiricism, idealism, materialism, positivism, pragmatism, phenomenology, existentialism, Marxism, Islamic existentialism, and neopositivism, as well as assess their relevance to modern dynamics such as identity crises, technological advances, and changes in socio-economic structures. Using a conceptual approach to literature review, various previous studies were analyzed to build an integrated understanding of the position of each school of thought in the development of science and social practice. The findings show that rationalism and empiricism continue to underpin scientific methods, idealism and materialism offer different perspectives on social construction, phenomenology and existentialism deepen the understanding of subjective experience, while Marxism and pragmatism provide an analytical framework for power relations and practical action. Neopositivism continues to influence quantitative methodology, while Islamic existentialism provides a contextual moral perspective. This study emphasizes the need for an interdisciplinary approach because no single philosophical school of thought is capable of explaining reality in its entirety.

References

Abrori, R. (2025). Cabang-cabang filsafat dan aliran-aliran filsafat: Systematic literature review. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 5(2), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v5i2.992

Adinata, A., Asepta, U. Y., & Winarno, A. (2024). Situation-based management in a philosophical framework: A critical approach to decision making. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 1(4), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.61132/IJEMS.V1I4.334

Bouzioti, D. (2023). Introducing the phenomenological model of performance practice (PMPP): Phenomenological research design and the lived experience in performance. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211142

Feriyansyah, F., & Supartiningsih, S. (2024). Isu-isu kontemporer filsafat sosial dalam perspektif aliran eksistensialis. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 7(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i1.65130

Gkevrou, M., & Stamovlasis, D. (2025). Merger of critical realism and complexity theory: Laying the foundations for a unified ontological and epistemological perspective for the study of social systems. Foundations of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-025-10005-4

Griseri, P. (2021). Hume and Kant and managers epistemology: An interview. Philosophy of Management, 20(3), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-021-00186-w

Haluti, R., & Munirah. (2022). Epistemology of Muhammad Iqbal’s existentialism: Its elevation to Islamic education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam & Budi Pekerti, 4, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.58194/pekerti.v4i2.3293

Horrigan-Kelly, M., Millar, M., & Dowling, M. (2016). Understanding the key tenets of Heidegger’s philosophy for interpretive phenomenological research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916680634

Irvan, I. A., Afgani, M. W., & Isnaini, M. (2023). Filosofi penelitian kuantitatif dalam manajemen pendidikan Islam. Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 6(4), 1407–1417.

Khanafi, A. F., Arifin, S., & Mukhlis, F. (2025). Muhammad Iqbal’s Islamic education philosophy: Critical analysis MBKM curriculum. Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v11i1.390

Knio, K. (2024). Special issue on realist complexity: An introduction. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 54, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12425

Kouam, A. W. F. (2025). A systematic literature review of post-positivism and critical realism as epistemological frameworks in educational research. International Journal of Changes in Education, 2(November 2024), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewijce52024338

Schiemer, G. (Ed.). (n.d.). The legacy of the Vienna circle. Springer.

Sousa-Martins, N., Azevedo, L., Vieira, L., & Maria, C. (2025). A phenomenological study of the cultural lived experiences among Angolan women with breast cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 76(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102885

Sutrisno, S. A. (2025). Martin Heidegger’s existentialism as a paradigm in Islamic religious education. At-Thullab: Jurnal Mahasiswa Studi Islam, 7(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.20885/tullab.vol7.iss1.art7

Wall, F. (2025). Management control from a critical rationalist perspective: A discussion on results controls. Philosophy of Management, 24(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-025-00336-4

Webber, J. (2019). Rethinking existentialism. Oxford University Press, 11(3), 277–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811401979

Widjaja, I., Hermawansyah, A., & Winarno, A. (2024). Mengenal berbagai aliran metode berpikir filsafat dalam penerapan manajemen. ePaper Bisnis: International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management, 1(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.61132/epaperbisnis.v1i4.144

Yulianto, H. (2021). Philosophy of management science. 1(1), 152–162.

Zhang, T. (2023). Critical realism: A critical evaluation. Social Epistemology, 37(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2080127

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Siti Ulfatul Faizah, Agung Winarno, & Subagyo Subagyo. (2025). Aliran-Aliran Filsafat dan Relevansinya dalam Pemikiran Modern. Moral : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 2(4), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.61132/moral.v2i4.1553

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.