Efektivitas Metode Ceramah dalam Pembelajaran Filsafat Ilmu bagi Mahasiswa Baru di STAI Al-Andina Sukabumi

Dasep Hanan Mubarok; Neng Lailatul Faaizah; Aceng Supyan; Syifa Aqmaliyah; Muhammad Zaki

doi:10.61132/akhlak.v3i1.1869

Authors

Dasep Hanan Mubarok Institut Madani Nusantara
Neng Lailatul Faaizah Institut Madani Nusantara
Aceng Supyan Institut Madani Nusantara
Syifa Aqmaliyah Institut Madani Nusantara
Muhammad Zaki Institut Madani Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/akhlak.v3i1.1869

Keywords:

Assessment System, Higher Education, Learning Evaluation, Lecture Method, Philosophy Of Science

Abstract

This study aims to describe the implementation of learning methods, assessment systems, and learning evaluation in the Philosophy of Science course at STAI Al-Andina Sukabumi, particularly for first-semester students. The research employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with the course lecturer to explore the rationale for selecting the lecture method, assessment practices, and evaluation strategies applied in the learning process. The findings indicate that the lecture method combined with guided discussion was chosen as an adaptive strategy to help students develop a conceptual foundation for abstract and theoretical material. The assessment system places greater emphasis on student attendance and participation as a form of process-oriented assessment that encourages active engagement. Learning evaluation is conducted continuously through technology-based quizzes to monitor students’ understanding progressively. These results suggest that the Philosophy of Science learning process at STAI Al-Andina has adopted a contextual and formative pedagogical approach; however, further development of more varied assessment and evaluation methods is still needed to accommodate students’ diverse abilities.

References

Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. University of Chicago Press.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Open University Press.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.

Exley, K., & Dennick, R. (2004). Giving a lecture: From presenting to teaching. RoutledgeFalmer.

Falahhuddin, A., Claudia, S. I., & El Adawiyah, S. (2024). Kurangnya budaya literasi akademik dan dampaknya terhadap pemahaman konsep akademik mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 11(3), 58–65.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.

Harahap, I. I., & Albina, M. (2025). Analisis efektivitas penerapan metode ceramah sebagai strategi pembelajaran di dalam kelas. AZKIYA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 45–56.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sani, R. A. (2021). Pembelajaran berorientasi HOTS (higher order thinking skills). Bumi Aksara.

Sari, J. P., Aisyah, N., Ibrahim, D., & S. (2024). Filsafat ilmu pengetahuan dalam pembelajaran abad ke-21. At-Tajdid: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam, 8(1), 1–7.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.

Susanti, R., & Hamzah, A. (2022). Evaluasi formatif sebagai upaya meningkatkan pemahaman konsep mahasiswa. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 13(2), 112–123.