Penerapan Kaidah Fiqih Jinayah dalam Qadzaf Secara Kinayah

Authors

  • Hafid Gunawan Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Nina Nirmala Sari Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Muhammad Akmal Muzhafar Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/hidayah.v2i2.944

Keywords:

Ḥadd punishment, Islamic criminal law, Kinayah expression, Legal maxims, Qadzaf

Abstract

This study examines the application of Islamic criminal law (fiqih jinayah) principles, specifically in the case of qadzaf—accusation of adultery without valid proof—when conveyed through kinayah (indirect or allusive expressions). The focus is on how legal maxims such as al-ḥudūd tudra’ bi al-syubuhāt and al-aṣl barā’at al-dzimmah are employed to assess the legal validity of ambiguous accusations. This research adopts a qualitative approach through library research, analyzing both classical and contemporary Islamic legal texts. The findings reveal that qadzaf in the form of kinayah does not meet the criteria for ḥadd punishment due to its interpretive uncertainty and lack of clear evidence. Therefore, ta'zir—a discretionary punishment—should be applied instead, based on public interest and judicial discretion. This study is significant in addressing modern social communication dynamics, especially in the digital age, and contributes to a fair, contextual, and cautious implementation of Islamic criminal law.

References

Al-Zuhaili, W. (1986). Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Dār al-Fikr.

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Audah, A. Q. (1992). Al-Tasyrî’ al-Jinā’i al-Islāmī muqāranan bi al-Qānūn al-Waḍ’ī. Mu’assasah Al-Risalah.

Djazuli, A. (2006). Kaidah-kaidah fikih (1st ed.). Prenada Media Group.

Hamim, K. (2020). Fiqih jinayah. Sanabil.

Hasan, M., & Saebani, B. A. (2013). Hukum pidana Islam: Fiqih jinayah. Pustaka Setia.

Ibn Qudamah. (n.d.). Al-Mughni. Dar al-Fikr.

Munawwir, A. W. (1997). Al-Munawwir: Kamus Arab-Indonesia. Pustaka Progressif.

Nurul Irfan, M. (2013). Fiqih jinayah. Amzah.

Quran NU Online. (n.d.). Surat Al-Ma’idah Ayat 48: Arab, Latin, terjemah dan tafsir lengkap. Diakses 2 Mei 2025, dari https://quran.nu.or.id

Setiawan, R. F., & Lisnawati, L. (2023). Jipen: Menilik hukum adat Dayak perspektif kaidah fikih jinayah. Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum (JISYAKU), 2(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.23971/jisyaku.v2i1.6040

Siregar, F. A., Harahap, R. B., Munawar, S. A., Fauziah, Y., & Julu, T. (2024). Fiqih jinayah kontemporer. Semesta Aksara.

Supriani, S., & Saputra, W. (2021). Jarimah qadzaf (menuduh zina): Studi komparasi hukum pidana Islam dan hukum positif Indonesia. Jurnal Darussalam: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.59259/jd.v1i1.2

Wahid, A. (2001). Fiqh minoritas: Fikih lintas agama demi masyarakat yang damai. The Wahid Institute dan LKiS.

Ya’la, A. (1983). Al-Aḥkām al-Sulṭāniyyah. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-02

How to Cite

Hafid Gunawan, Nina Nirmala Sari, & Muhammad Akmal Muzhafar. (2025). Penerapan Kaidah Fiqih Jinayah dalam Qadzaf Secara Kinayah. Hidayah : Cendekia Pendidikan Islam Dan Hukum Syariah, 2(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.61132/hidayah.v2i2.944

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.