Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Aktif Berbasis Kolaboratif untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konseptual Siswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/hidayah.v2i3.1332Keywords:
Active Learning Model, Collaborative Learning, Conceptual Understanding, Islamic Religious Education, Student ParticipationAbstract
This study aims to describe the implementation of an active learning model based on collaboration to improve students’ conceptual understanding in Islamic Religious Education (PAI). The background of this research stems from the low level of student engagement in the learning process, which has resulted in less optimal understanding of religious concepts. The research employed a qualitative approach with a classroom action research (CAR) design conducted in two cycles. The subjects were eleventh-grade students at a senior high school in City X. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and conceptual understanding tests. The findings revealed that the implementation of the collaborative active learning model increased students’ participation in learning activities, fostered critical thinking skills, and enhanced their conceptual understanding of Islamic Education materials. Through group discussions, problem-solving activities, and reflection sessions, students became more cognitively and affectively engaged in the learning process. Therefore, the collaborative active learning model can serve as an effective alternative strategy to improve both the process and outcomes of Islamic Religious Education learning.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Azra, A. (2020). Paradigma baru pendidikan nasional: Rekonstruksi dan demokratisasi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hamalik, O. (2017). Proses belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mujib, A., & Mudzakkir, J. (2017). Ilmu pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Kencana.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Sari, D., & Prasetyo, A. (2021). Implementasi pembelajaran kolaboratif dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 12(2), 45-55.
Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Sudjana, N. (2019). Dasar-dasar proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational psychology. New York: Pearson Education.
Wulandari, N. (2022). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kolaboratif terhadap peningkatan motivasi dan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, 8(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.26618/jkpd.v8i1.9694
Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia
